random updates
I’ve been hibernating. Sick for two weeks, tired, depressed. I canceled my cable TV to save money, which is actually good because it means I’m getting stuff done for SuperVegan and am reading books instead of watching Futurama reruns. And I can get Colbert, Stewart, and Rachel Maddow online for free, so there’s no reason to pay $70/month for cable. But it’s kind of depressing, anyway.
We’re going to be adding more cities to SuperVegan’s restaurant guide (right now it’s just NYC). So I’ve been very busy working on the programming for that. Of course, once the programming’s done we have to actually enter the data… um, any vegans out there want to volunteer? I guess the ideal is to get local people on the ground in each city to keep the information accurate and up-to-date, but I don’t know how feasible that’ll be. We’re having enough trouble keeping NYC up-to-date, and we all live here!
I read a couple of books. I finished Patrick O’Brian’s Master and Commander after leaving it half-read on a shelf for a year. I didn’t like it. Like Dunnett, it’s full of historically accurate jargon that’s difficult for a modern reader to parse; unlike Dunnett, the story and characters were just not compelling enough for me to want to put in the effort. I basically just finished it to get it out of the way. I bought more books in Forester’s Hornblower series instead; I found that one much more readable and the main character so much funnier (inadvertently) and more interesting.
I also read Neil Gaiman’s The Graveyard Book because I got a free copy at BEA. It was cute, although typical of Gaiman in that none of it really made sense. He tells stories on the level of metaphor, which is nice, but he doesn’t have the plots or logic to back them up. I always want to know hows and whys that he never provides. This isn’t really a criticism, because it’s a perfectly legitimate way of writing, it’s just not one that appeals to me personally. (I have the same problem with most Stephen King.)
I’m currently reading Naomi Novik’s His Majesty’s Dragon, but it’s slow going. I’m only 50 pages in, but I just… so don’t care about dragons. I find them creepy and silly and unpleasant to read about, actually; it’s a credit to
grrm that I love A Song of Ice and Fire despite the dragons. (It probably helps that I was already totally into the story by the very late point that he finally introduced the dragons, and he slipped them in very slowly.) But I’ll try to finish this book; I want to give it a fair shot since I think the author is doing awesome things for fandom via her involvement with the OTW.
Oh yeah, and Writercon is still happening. Come hang out and talk about fanfic for a few days. It’ll be great.
Update on my continuing Bowie obsession: I skipped ahead 15 years after Scary Monsters and am now listening to 1. Outside. I’m just not quite ready to face 80s Bowie yet. Or Tin Machine. (I finished two Bowie bios and most of the encyclopedia and none of them had anything nice to say about Tin Machine.)
I like Outside (does it actually need the 1 now that there’s no 2? apparently it was supposed to be part of a series that never happened). Strangely, my strongest reaction to it is deja vu. I’ve been approaching this Bowie obsession as a fascinating glimpse into the pop culture world of the past–England in the 70s was a long time ago and very far away. But Outside is not only from the era when I was most into music–it’s actually part of the genre that I was listening to at the time. I know several of these songs! I even knew they were by Bowie, but I never thought about it, which is a bit strange since the default Bowie image in my head is cheesy 80s Bowie, and these songs are pretty antithetical to that.
Anyway, so I know “The Hearts Filthy Lesson” because it was all over MTV at the time (remember when MTV actually showed videos???) and it was in the movie Seven, and I know “I’m Deranged” because it was in Lost Highway and was on the Lost Highway soundtrack, which I apparently listened to quite a bit as a kid since it was produced by Trent Reznor. Smashing Pumpkins’ “Eye” is on there too, which I totally forgot about–I love that song! And Manson’s “Apple of Sodom,” and of course NIN’s “Perfect Drug.” I’m going to have to dig that album out and just immerse myself in a fit of 90s nostalgia. (I never thought I would be nostalgic for the 1990s!)
So anyway, Bowie’s Outside is really good. It’s less of a stretch for me than other Bowie works have been–it’s basically the default genre that I expect myself to like, 90s mainstream goth/industrial/whatever. In addition to the other Lost Highway songs, it also reminds me of Depeche Mode’s Ultra and (most especially) KMFDM’s Adios (over and over I find myself thinking, “Wow, this reminds me of Adios“). Although this is better than Adios–I spent a month or so listening to that album when it came out, and it’s got some good moments, but I never particularly warmed to it and wouldn’t dig it out these days.
Outside feels rather like a progression from Diamond Dogs–it’s a futuristic dystopia populated by an array of strange characters. I’d say Bowie takes it too far here, though; Diamond Dogs has a spoken word intro and its songs are full of characters, but Outside goes beyond eerie to plain old cheesy with its repeated spoken word interludes done by Bowie in the voices of the characters. It’s… too literal, maybe? And a bit silly–David Bowie is too well-known a personality for me to think anything other than “LOL that’s David Bowie” even when he’s doing the voice of a detective or a 14-year-old girl or whatever.
But the songs themselves are very strong–dark and eerie and interesting. The opener, “Outside,” is fascinating, and the use of piano throughout the record adds a distinctive touch that you wouldn’t normally get from this genre. The concept is so 90s, a futuristic nostalgic noir dystopia, very Dark City or Strange Days. And like I said, the overall nostalgic feeling is quite a draw. I’m glad I like this, because I was worried that I wouldn’t like anything at all after 1980. So, the Bowie obsession continues a bit longer.
Current Mood:
blah

16 Responses to “random updates”
Chase820 on June 12, 2009 3:23 pm | Link
I hope you feel better soon!
I actually like a couple of Tin Machine songs. “Heart’s Filthy Lesson” is a glorious mess.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 12, 2009 3:44 pm | Link
Thanks. :)
It’s weird to read about things before I actually hear them. I’ve liked some things that I’ve not expected to like, and disliked things that I assumed I would like. So, I’ll definitely give Tin Machine a chance, when I get to it.
[reply to this comment]
thirdbird on June 12, 2009 4:18 pm | Link
Gosh, that’s so funny about Master & Commander, because I’m still having so much trouble getting through the first Dunnett book (but there is sudden progress this week! I’m on page 160 or 170-something now I think), but I LOVE LOVE O’Brien so hard and I’ve been trying to puzzle out why I can do one and not the other. It probably is mainly character-love driven, because I have such a ginormous crush on Stephen Maturin that I would follow him through any amount of convoluted naval nonsense, whereas I’m not quite there with Lymond yet.
I hope things get less depressing for you soon.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 12, 2009 5:29 pm | Link
I thought you’d totally given up on Lymond–I’m glad you’re still trying! What is it about Maturin that appeals to you? Maybe it’s just a difference in the character archetypes we’re drawn to; Lymond’s so screwed up, smart, competent, and charismatic that it was impossible for me to find him anything other than fascinating. But then I like the antihero type (Spike, Jaime Lannister, Methos, Brian Kinney…) and Lymond fits right in.
A lot of the mystery of the first book revolves around just who exactly Lymond is and what drives him, so you probably won’t know if you like him until the end (so much of what he does in the book in cast in a different light by later events).
I really am curious what you like about Maturin. I expected to like him based on commentary I’ve read from other people, but there was just nothing in this book that drew me in. I mean, he was fine, I liked him better than Aubrey, but … there was nothing compelling about him for me.
[reply to this comment]
thirdbird on June 12, 2009 9:17 pm | Link
I had given up on Lymond and then suddenly picked up the book again for some reason earlier this week! It does feel like the kind of fiction I tend to enjoy if I can get past the confusion of it all. We’ll see.
What I love about Maturin, hmmm, interesting question. He pings several of my character kinks (dry wit, intelligence, unconventional looks, secretly tormented) but a lot of it is the way he feels about Jack, too - I just can’t get enough of their relationship. I mean, the hurt/comfort alone, my GOD, one of them is constantly needing tending to in these books, and they are right there for each other every time. The second and third books in this series are my absolute favorites, and I think HMS Surprise could really stand alone without reading anything else in this series, but I don’t know that I’d recommend it if Master and Commander was that much of a chore to get through.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 14, 2009 4:00 am | Link
Okay, if you like hurt/comfort, you have definitely got to read to the end of the first Lymond book. Dunnett does hurt/comfort better than any writer I’ve ever encountered. (And, possible TMI, I’ve read a lot of h/c!)
Do those Maturin character traits come out more in later books? Because I kind of got little hints of them in this one, but not enough to draw in my interest. I did find him the most appealing character, but just not enough for me to want to keep reading. The ratio of jargon-about-boats to character development was just not working in my favor.
[reply to this comment]
thirdbird on June 14, 2009 12:17 pm | Link
Oh, I am an enormous h/c junkie, although I find I am getting picky in my old age and adding the qualifier “when it’s actually well written.” I have confidence in Dunnett as a writer, I just worry that I am too stupid to follow along sufficiently, but it’s getting a bit easier by page 200-something in the first book…I think I will get there!
Maturin definitely develops hugely as a character in the next two books and there isn’t quite as much jargon about boats - actually no boats at all in the first long part of the second book, which is really very Jane Austenish and mainly all about setting up the love triangle which drives the whole next part of the series. So, maybe worth a try, although if you were totally nonplussed by the first book then maybe not. You would probably know within the first fifty pages of Post Captain whether it was going to be worth it for you.
[reply to this comment]
netweight on June 12, 2009 5:43 pm | Link
I loved “His Majesty’s Dragon”. Basically, because Laurence and Temeraire read so obviously as a slash pairing, with a bunch a slash tropes being used, and so there was this permanent feeling of being *in* on the joke, so to speak. I kept going, “I cannot *believe* she pulled this off!” It was both hilarious and awesome.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 12, 2009 6:07 pm | Link
But… but… Temeraire’s a dragon! I can’t even get past incest; bestiality is definitely not my cup of tea!
(But, okay, I will try to put my slash googles on and get some enjoyment out of it that way…)
[reply to this comment]
beck_liz on June 12, 2009 7:02 pm | Link
While I’m not at the point of slashing Temeraire and Lawrence necessarily (I had other troubles getting through the book, which I don’t even remember anymore save that I got 3/4 through and lost interest), I don’t actually think of it as bestiality. For one reason: Temeraire is intelligent. Generally, the beasts in beastiality aren’t. That makes a rather significant difference for me. (I can’t even believe I’m admitting I’ve put this much thought into it. :-))
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 14, 2009 3:56 am | Link
But… he’s got a dragon’s body!
And, okay, let’s pretend they’re intellectual equals. Temeraire is still a newborn being taught about the world by Laurence, who is something like 30 years older than him, so the power dynamic there is deeply skewed… Laurence is more like his mother!
(*is not at all serious, but is highly amused by this train of thought*)
[reply to this comment]
netweight on June 13, 2009 8:40 pm | Link
LOL!
I hope you know I didn’t mean it literally.
[reply to this comment]
deadsoul820 on June 12, 2009 9:13 pm | Link
I so enjoy you learning to enjoy Bowie. He’s been my main man (no pun intended) since I was in high school in the late 70’s and early 80’s. Scary Monsters was the first album of his I bought with babysitting money.
Have you warmed up more to Young Americans? It’s one of my favorites, probably because I knew it before all the blue-eyed new wave new romantics started copying it.
Unfortunately, Bowie and I broke up when he went all rock star cliche and married a supermodel (and his post-Let’s Dance albums sucked) and I’ve never gotten back into him. At least I missed all the Tin Machine (which I keep wanting to call Tin Gods) nastiness.
Um, yeah, that’s all. Just wanted to let you know I was reading and rocking to your Bowie posts.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 14, 2009 4:18 am | Link
I’m glad you’re reading! I feel like I’m talking to myself a lot of the time. Thanks for letting me know.
I have warmed to Young Americans, but I don’t love it the way I love some of the other albums. I enjoy “Young Americans” and “Fame,” and I think a couple of other songs like “Win” are good, but honestly I can’t even tell most of the songs on it apart. I’ve never intently listened to it the way I have most of the other albums, or been into it enough to listen to it exclusively. But at least I don’t have that “OMGWTF am I listening to?” reaction anymore.
I think I like his stuff that’s darker and more conceptual, and not so much his stuff that’s more dance-oriented/love songs/mainstream radio songs. Like, of everything I’ve listened to so far, I think the ones that most appeal to me personally are Station to Station (especially the title track) and Diamond Dogs. (I love Diamond Dogs so much! It’s like this insane futuristic noir dystopia. Presumably the reason Outside works for me is that it’s so similar to Diamond Dogs.) Although I also think Ziggy Stardust and Hunky Dory are technically superior and really awesome in their own rights. Whereas I guess I’d lump Young Americans in with Let’s Dance and the more dance-oriented 80s stuff that’s less interesting lyrically/conceptually. Although Station to Station proves that you can have a lot of really danceable songs and yet be incredibly experimental and tonally dark, so who knows….
See, my entire conception of Bowie has always been that supermodel-marrying rock star cliche, so this whole thing has been me trying to get past that and constantly being surprised by how good he can be despite the stereotyped image I had of him. Based on what I’ve read, it seems like the cheesy-sell-out-cliche period was really only like ten years for him out of forty of making music, but it was his superstar period and so has been kind of defining for the general conception of who he is. It does seem like his reputation has been largely redeemed these days based on his 90s and early 00s work and based on the massive influence of his 70s work….
One of the proposals in David Buckley’s Bowie bio (the non-sleazy one that I read) is that the general idea that Bowie was always lame underneath and revealed his true boring self is wrong, and that actually “normal” is just a mask that the incredibly strange man that is David Bowie successfully wears. But then a biographer would write that… it’s a good way to sell books, to propose that your subject is more interesting than he may appear….
[reply to this comment]
nutmeg3 on June 13, 2009 1:38 am | Link
I’ve been wondering where you were! I especially thought of you this morning when I read an excellent review of Bowie’s son’s directorial debut (I think it said it’s his debut), Moon.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on June 14, 2009 3:52 am | Link
I’m going to see him (Bowie’s son) do a Q&A about his movie tomorrow. Why, yes, I am an obsessive geek.
[reply to this comment]