GIP (+ rambling)
Doctor/Master made it to the final Writercon face-off–yay! The winning ship will be featured in the Dirty Drabbles reading at Writercon ‘09. Go vote for our guys!
***
I think I’m just going to have to accept that I’ll never be one of those people with wide-ranging, eclectic artistic tastes. I’ve always fallen into the pattern of becoming completely and utterly obsessed with one thing and of wringing every last nuance of meaning out of it for years on end–and of not being able to get into anything else until I’m finished with it. Forcing myself to watch/listen to/read things that I’m not passionately interested in has just adamantly not worked. I’m twenty-six, and this tendency is showing no signs of change, so I guess I just have to go with it.
On the plus side, the stuff consuming my brain these days is better, and a lot more wide-ranging and eclectic within its own boundaries. I’ve been thinking up this whole post about how David Bowie is similar to Raymond Watts (in terms of incorporating diverse musical genres and experimenting) and how both are much more interesting than what I listened to in high school. I’m not going to write it, because I’m lazy and I don’t think anyone would read it, but it’s percolating in my brain in interesting ways.
(One is that it’s reflected in the ways Bowie has influenced the artists I grew up listening to. Marilyn Manson stole a lot from Bowie, in very obvious and uninteresting ways. I’m noticing places where Raymond Watts was inspired by Bowie too, but always in far more interesting ways than Manson. [But then everything Watts does is more interesting than Manson.] I also kind of want to do a picspam of “blatant things that Manson ripped off from Bowie,” because I’m mildly annoyed that I grew up admiring a lot of things in Manson that he stole without really even putting his own unique mark on them. I have the weirdest relationship with Manson’s work–a lot of fond nostalgia for his concerts and genuine musical respect for Antichrist Superstar and Mechanical Animals, but a lot of disgust and irritation for his limitations as a musician and as a human being.)
***
I watched the movie Human Traffic this weekend, because I wanted to return it to Netflix so that I can get Labyrinth. (I want to see Labyrinth again because I’m wondering if I’ll finally like it. My dislike goes back to being five and hating muppets, so perhaps things have changed. Plus everyone says Bowie is ultra-hot in this movie and yet I have never seen the hotness. So we’ll see.)
Anyway, Human Traffic was pretty awful. It’s about a bunch of loser kids in Cardiff who escape their dead-end lives by going on drug-addled binges on weekends. Except it’s not as dark as it sounds; it’s more of an implausible romantic comedy between characters I didn’t like and couldn’t relate to. On the plus side, John Simm was hot. It’s really only worth watching when in the height of a John Simm infatuation, or if for some reason you’re desiring insight into the Cardiff club scene. (The main thing that struck me was how, for all these kids lived for these “amazing” drugged out club experiences, said experiences were actually incredibly dull and pointless from the outside. There was nothing intellectually or emotionally stimulating about them. I can relate to the desire for transcendent, meaningful, moving human experiences [I always seem to reach for them via concerts, or theater, or travel], but … taking drugs is such a stupid way to grasp at them. Even in the film, the really meaningful thing is not the drugs but the two friends who fall in love–their actual joy seems far superior to any drug-induced state.)
***
Nostalgia after watching that recent Highlander reunion clip inspired me to watch the Highlander episode “Methos” again this weekend. There are several things deeply wrong with this episode, among them:
* Methos’ five-thousand year old diary in the form of, literally, one continuous book, going back to “Sanskrit and Ancient Greek,” but in bound format and somehow not crumbling to dust. And that he leaves it sitting out for anyone wandering into his house to peruse at will.
* Duncan MacLeod wandering alone through a dark fog-ridden Paris tunnel at night … reading Sartre. “I’m so existentialist I don’t need light to read words”? WTF? Stupid pretentious faux-sophistication–it’s concentrated essence of Duncan MacLeod.
It’s just, I try not to laugh, really, but it’s the fatal flaw of Highlander. They’re going for something interesting, but they can’t resist cranking it up past the breaking point into cheese and melodrama, so they end up drowning in a self-created sea of cliches. I end up wanting to pat them on the heads and tell them it’s cute that they’re trying.
Still, Peter Wingfield is lovely.
***
In pursuit of non-embarrassing David Bowie icons (not sure if I’m there, or if such a thing is even possible–I feel that there’s kind of an inherently embarrassing teenage girl thing about LJ icons), I’ve come across lots of images from the film The Man Who Fell To Earth. Which I’m not sure I want to see–it sounds like something that’s better in screencaps than it would be if I actually had to sit down and watch it–but then again, the icons are so pretty I’m kind of feeling like maybe it’s necessary. I’ll put it after Labyrinth in my Netflix queue, though based on my history it’ll probably sit unwatched next to my DVD player for six months. Good thing I switched to the cheapest Netflix plan.
Also, OMG, icon makers, a link is not a fake cut! It’s just a link! (And a drabble is exactly 100 words! And you damn kids get off my lawn!)
Tags: david bowie, highlander, marilyn manson, movie reviews, music, pig
16 Responses to “GIP (+ rambling)”
cindergal on March 30, 2009 5:29 pm | Link
Have you seen The Hunger? I haven’t seen it in years and years, but I remember it as interesting, beautifully filmed, and somewhat incoherent. :-) But the three leads are certainly attractive. I think that’s the only Bowie film I’ve seen.
The drabble thing drives me insane. ;-)
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 6:06 pm | Link
I have this feeling that the kind of acting that works well on stage frequently looks ridiculous on screen, and that the kind of dramatic sensibility that can be great on a record album often comes across as absurd when translated to other media (especially those like film in which subtlety is more of a virtue). And also that Bowie has done so many embarrassing things that I’m afraid of ruining my burgeoning enjoyment of his work by taking in too much badness at once–thus the hesitance to delve into his film career. But The Hunger is next in the Netflix queue after The Man Who Fell To Earth. :)
[reply to this comment]
cindergal on March 30, 2009 6:20 pm | Link
I don’t remember lack of acting subtlety as being an issue in The Hunger (though like I said, it was a long time ago). It was more the film as a whole and some of the director’s choices - but I won’t say anymore until you see it. I’ll be interested in what you think of it.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 6:22 pm | Link
Given my Netflix record it’ll probably take a year, but I’ll post about it when I see it.
[reply to this comment]
trepkos on March 30, 2009 5:55 pm | Link
The Man Who Fell to Earth is definitely worth watching, but ultimately very depressing.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 6:21 pm | Link
Thanks for the warning. Somehow I love dark and disturbing music but don’t deal well with upsetting films. They’re too real maybe? Seeing an unhappy film can depress me for weeks.
[reply to this comment]
trepkos on March 30, 2009 6:35 pm | Link
Oh, me too. Brazil was another one.
[reply to this comment]
caia on March 30, 2009 6:41 pm | Link
The Man Who Fell to Earth isn’t a good movie per se, but it’s worth seeing purely to marvel at David Bowie faking human very badly.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 9:09 pm | Link
*is intrigued*
I will probably get drunk and then watch it.
[reply to this comment]
netweight on March 30, 2009 6:45 pm | Link
“The Hunger” over “The Man Who Fell to Earth”, definitively. Though I don’t remember much about either, but I corroborate the comments above. I think I actually blocked most of “The Man Who fell to Earth” out of my mind, especially since I read the book too, and it’s utterly, despairingly depressing. Most of what I remember from “The Hunger” is that it’s stunningly shot, with a beautiful use of light (and yes, it doesn’t hurt that the protagonists are attractive too).
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 9:12 pm | Link
Thanks for the advice–hmm, maybe I’ll watch The Hunger first.
I mostly just want to ogle young Bowie. Sometimes you have to let your shallow side run free, you know?
[reply to this comment]
netweight on March 31, 2009 3:49 pm | Link
Moi? Understand the need to indulge the shallow? Jamais, ma chère!
;-)
[reply to this comment]
versaphile on March 30, 2009 8:40 pm | Link
It was very sneaky to put Doctor/Master and Ten in the polls so much, to make me keep donating. :-P
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on March 30, 2009 9:11 pm | Link
Ah ha, you’ve discovered our evil scheme!
To be fair, Doctor/Master is in there again because we donated so much the first time that they made the top ten for the final showdown. >:)
[reply to this comment]
Nancy on April 1, 2009 2:06 am | Link
You watched Highlander and expected content? They want to be profound but keep splashing around in the shallow. But Peter Wingfield was delicious.
Plus, I HOPE to get your package mailed by Saturday. I thought I’d have tons of time this week.
Ooops. I was wrong.
[reply to this comment]
rusty-halo on April 1, 2009 12:30 pm | Link
Well, I got into Highlander when I was ten or eleven years old. My taste was not so refined! And even then I knew it was fairly awful, which is why the few awesome moments stand out so vividly in my mind (mostly the Methos episodes, especially “Comes a Horseman”/”Revelation 6:8″).
Thank you so much for the package! No rush at all. I really appreciate it. :)
[reply to this comment]