Random: Watchmen, Moonlight, Rachel Maddow, and why I can barely watch American TV these days

random-watchmen-moonlight-rachel-maddow-and-why-i-can-barely-watch-american-tv-these-days

I haven’t been posting much, because I’ve been stressed out and busy and tired, and who wants to hear about that?

I have, however, accumulated a couple of mildly interesting (I hope) things to post about.

* I saw Watchmen opening night at Union Square with [info]drujan. We’d each had a half carafe of sangria at Pukk, and we ended up in the second row at a near-vertical angle to the screen, so mostly my memories of it are blurry and distorted. It was racist, sexist, and homophobic in all the predictable ways*, but it was also much more interesting than most mainstream movies of its type, and it asked a lot of good questions.

I like the way the superhero mythology was used as a metaphor for America’s disillusion with its own ideals. Despite the 1980s setting, I didn’t think the film was dated at all; what, nuclear devastation, political corruption, and social decay aren’t concerns anymore? It almost made me nostalgic for Nixon; at least when he did insane unethical shit, he got called on it. And I thought the image of the Twin Towers was used tastefully, even though it made me cry. (Also, I really need to not watch movies where NYC gets destroyed. I have enough apocalyptic nightmares already.)

On the lighter side, I am highly amused that every single review I read just had to mention the OMG GIANT BLUE DIGITAL PENIS!!!11! What is wrong with Americans that they fixate their shock and outrage on a part of anatomy that half the population has, in a film chock full of graphic violence and attempted rape? (Ugh, and now I’m mentioning it too.) I so didn’t care, but that could also be because I was busy staring at the pretty blond guy. Did you guys see the pretty blond guy? He was so pretty! I’m trying not to get fannish, because I don’t like the fandom and I didn’t connect with any of the characters, but … it’s two weeks later and I’m still thinking about how hot the hot blond guy was. Why am I drawn to archetypes in fiction that I would loathe in real life? My brain just shuts down and goes “Mmmm… magnificent bastard.”

But seriously, he was really pretty.

* The stock archetype of “the girl” among a far more diverse variety of male characters; hitting the dead lesbian cliche in the opening credits; two black male characters, one inept and one evil, who both die.

* Then the next night, [info]jaydk and I saw Coraline. Proof that you don’t need to be “edgy” to make a good movie: it was far better than Watchmen. Smart, funny, well-written, beautifully filmed–the 3D was absolutely lovely. The story was creative and intriguing and eerie, and the lead character was clever and brave. Why do childrens’ stories do such a superior job of portraying three-dimensional female characters? Is it just that we’ve been culturally conditioned to be unable to fathom a post-pubescent female in a way that doesn’t put her sexuality front and center?

* I’m seeing a lot of talk about Doctor Who finale casting spoilers. As far as I can tell, they’re from a tabloid that regularly makes shit up, so why is anyone taking them seriously? Am I missing something? (This is a genuine question. Is there any reason to believe them? I don’t want to get excited about something that’s completely fabricated.)

* I’m reading Team of Rivals, Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book about Lincoln and his cabinet. It’s really interesting and I’m enjoying it, but I wish she’d stop spelling out what the reader is “supposed” to think. I can make up my own mind about what these guys did and why they did it; I don’t need the author inserting her own explanation that so-and-so was arrogant and ambitious on every page. Still, it’s mostly good. After being so absorbed in the 2008 election, it’s fascinating to see how American politics worked 150 years ago.

* And I’m still in the middle of The Disorderly Knights. I’m going to finish it and then take a break from the Lymond series, since it’s been less than six months since I re-read Pawn in Frankincense. Speaking of which, my mom just finished it and is in awe. In retrospect, I think Pawn is the best written and most moving book of the series.

* I watched the entire TV series Moonlight. Yeah, I don’t know why. It’s awful. Apparently I still have a thing for vampire stories? Well, and Sophia Myles is talented and hot, and Jason Dohring is talented and hot, but the show did that stupid mainstream thing of focusing entirely on its unbelievably dull lead character. And not only is the main character as boring, straight-laced, cliched, and as pointless as it’s possible for a character to get (AND HE’S A VAMPIRE!), but the actor is like a black hole of charisma. He literally sucks all the spark out of a scene the second he steps into it. They should have fired him and made the show about Jason Dohring and Sophia Myles. And I’m not even going to get into how incredibly derivative it is of, well, everything, but most obviously Angel: the Series, which at least tried to do new and interesting things with the mix of genres and archetypes it incorporated.

Also, maybe it’s just that I don’t watch modern American TV anymore, but … what is with the women? As in, they are all exactly the same: tiny, emaciated, sharp-featured, and young. No matter what character they’re playing–boss, geek girl, random vampire–they are all pulled from such an incredibly narrow archetype of “woman” that it’s just completely absurd. Watching a show like this, you’d never even imagine that women exist on planet Earth larger than a size four, older than thirty-five, and without those sharp facial angles that Hollywood defines as “beautiful.” At least the men are allowed to have some diversity of age, size, and facial features, depending on the character they’re playing, but every single woman first has to fit into this absurdly narrow definition of “attractive” before anything else is taken into account.

This is why I can barely watch American TV anymore. Once you step away from it for a while, you come back and suddenly it’s like being hit over the head by how ridiculous it is. This narrow bunch of nearly-identical Hollywood model types plays pretty much every female character and the majority of male characters. Sure, an occasional talent pops through, but it’s painfully obvious that these people are cast almost entirely for their looks with no regard for skill. You end up with a bunch of interchangeable Barbies and Kens running around posing as every variety of adult human being. How am I supposed to take any of it seriously?

* But speaking of American TV that doesn’t suck, I have become completely addicted to The Rachel Maddow Show. It passes the Bechdel Test every night! Real women talk to each other about real issues! With none of the insipid concessions to what “women” are supposed to care about–no celebrity gossip, no plastic surgery, no cooking and baking, no fashion bullshit, just women as real individual human beings, with their own perspectives, who care about the world around them. (This shouldn’t be such a shock and a rarity!) And Rachel is brilliant, witty, funny, sweet, and adorable beyond words. I know she’s not perfect and I do disagree with her sometimes, but I always love watching her. She makes me wish Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert would do less joking and more news–after I watch her show, I feel like I’m not getting enough content from them. (Don’t worry, I still love them. Jon Stewart’s smackdown of Jim Cramer was a thing of beauty.)

* Oh, and I’m still listening to David Bowie. Ziggy Stardust remains my favorite, but I’ve added Hunky Dory, Aladdin Sane, and Diamond Dogs to the lineup and am enjoying them all. I tried to listen to Scary Monsters on the advice of my friend Jason, but aside from “Ashes to Ashes” it just totally didn’t work for me. I don’t understand what happened to Bowie in the 80s. It’s like he went from brilliant and hot and amazing to … just … so boring and annoying and straight. Maybe I’ll understand it better if I take each album chronologically. Or it could just be the Bowie draws from the zeitgeist of the decade, and the 80s was … well, the 80s.

Tags: books, david bowie, gender issues, jon stewart, lymond, moonlight, movie reviews, rachel maddow
  1. 11 Responses to “Random: Watchmen, Moonlight, Rachel Maddow, and why I can barely watch American TV these days”

  2. writteninstars on March 20, 2009 3:55 pm | Link

    I absolutely heart Rachel Maddow. I feel so much more enlightened when I watch her show. I didn’t start watching her show until last September or so…right when we were in the election crunch and she’s just so smart and funny. And her eyes are gorgeous!

    [reply to this comment]

    rusty-halo on March 20, 2009 4:21 pm | Link

    Same here! I came across her show right around the election and was in awe. I had never heard of her, so at first glance I assumed she would be another of your typical irritating female newsbots–then she made a reference to The Princess Bride and IT WAS LOVE.

    And, it’s not just that I enjoy getting news filtered through a personality I can relate to, it’s that she covers actual important news that impact the world we live in, instead of wasting time on celebrity marriages and the latest kidnapped blond girl. She is a true political geek AND a person whose opinions I respect.

    [reply to this comment]

    writteninstars on March 20, 2009 4:42 pm | Link

    Yes! Exactly all those things. I even love her friend, Kent Jones. I DVR it because I am usually out-of-town and in bed early, but I try to catch up on as many episodes as I can when I get home for the weekend. Also, even when she’s passionate about something, she doesn’t get all self-righteous and too in-your-face the way Olbermann does on occasion. I like Olbermann, don’t get me wrong, but sometimes he’s just a little much.

    I love her the bestest for my real news.

    [reply to this comment]

    rusty-halo on March 20, 2009 5:46 pm | Link

    I have such a hard time keeping up with Rachel Maddow, Jon Stewart, and Stephen Colbert (which are the only shows I watch)–it’s difficult to fit two hours of television per day! I try to catch up on weekends, but, yeah, that’s a lot of TV–I’m way behind.

    I don’t really like Keith Olbermann–most of the time I get the sense that he’s a showman, more concerned about his image than about the issues. He seems to me like the left-wing version of Limbaugh or O’Reilly–he simplifies the issues, demonizes anyone who disagrees, and uses it all as an excuse to pontificate. Not that I don’t agree with him a lot of the time–some of his special comments have been awesome–but I don’t think his rhetoric is productive, and I find myself actively cringing every time I try to watch his show. I don’t want to see people treating each other so rudely, no matter what political side they’re on–we criticize conservatives for it, so why sink to their level?

    I love that Rachel Maddow and Jon Stewart both try to engage with those who disagree, to honestly listen to them and give them a fair hearing. They set such great examples–it’s such a breath of fresh air to see people treating each other respectfully, acting like adults on cable news!

    [reply to this comment]

  3. Paratti on March 20, 2009 4:04 pm | Link

    You really have to watch ‘Being Human’. I know you’d love it.

    [reply to this comment]

    rusty-halo on March 20, 2009 4:12 pm | Link

    I am planning to watch it! Jaydk and I are having a movie night on Saturday and when I hit my limit of anime (her current obsession), Being Human is next on the list. :)

    [reply to this comment]

  4. Nancy on March 21, 2009 2:50 am | Link

    Thanks for the link to Reunion; I had no idea that anything like that had been produced. I loved seeing Methos again and Joe seems hardly to have aged at all. However, I had never watched anything on Hulu TV before and the constant commercial interruptions will keep me from doing it again.
    RE: mainstream American TV. Hear! Hear! I usually watch news shows on the BBC or some on PBS; otherwise, I stay away from most of what passes for entertainment. The bobble headed, huge boobed young women are obviously some male fantasy and I have no time and less patience for it.

    [reply to this comment]

  5. nutmeg3 on March 21, 2009 10:14 am | Link

    I long ago stopped worrying about what the women on US TV (and in US movies) look like and just pretend they all look like me. The standard they set is insane. I think every pre-teen girl in America should be given a copy of Real Women Have Curves and be required to watch it at least once a year, on her birthday, forever after.

    [reply to this comment]

    rusty-halo on March 23, 2009 7:27 pm | Link

    I think in a lot of ways it’s good for me to stop watching, although it’s probably not too healthy to get completely removed from pop culture (at least, it makes carrying on conversations with strangers increasingly difficult). But I find the longer I spend away from the images in mainstream TV/film/advertising, the healthier my own attitudes become, and the more obvious the flaws in mainstream imagery become. (Fast food is an example–the profusion of endless fast food advertisements everywhere just stands out more and more as time goes by, and looks increasingly absurd. And the construction of female beauty is another obvious one–I can find a direct correlation between the TV/film I’ve recently watched and the amount of self-loathing I feel when I look in the mirror.)

    [reply to this comment]

  6. Nancy on March 21, 2009 2:41 pm | Link

    More about Lymond. I should have remembered this earlier but, well, this just dropped into my hands while cleaning out one of my far-too-many bookcases this morning. Back before the Dunnett Companion, there was a Lymond Companion, complied by Carol Gleason, one of the original members of Dwork, the first Dunnett e-mail group. It’s a lot easier to follow as the references are more or less in page order (depending on what version of the books you have). Since the copy that I have is dated 1995, I doubt if it follows the page number of the current edition but, if you want it, send me your snail mail address to namastenancy at hotmail dot com and I’ll make a copy for you. I’ll also throw in a “Translation Guide to The Lymond Chronicles” by Nancy Wright. These are simply invaluable to understanding the numerous references in the books and I’m sorry that I didn’t remember them sooner.

    [reply to this comment]

    rusty-halo on March 23, 2009 6:42 pm | Link

    Wow, thank you so much! I will send you an email. :)

    [reply to this comment]

If the comment box is below this line, you're replying to the entire post. Click "reply to this comment" if you want to reply to a specific comment.

Post a Comment

* Comment replies will be emailed. Email address is never displayed.
* To show your InsaneJournal, Journalfen, or LiveJournal userpic, enter your journal URL as "Website." Or, upload an icon at Gravatar.
* Unregistered users can post simple HTML (<strong>, <em>, <a href>). Register to comment with unfiltered code (including YouTube embeds and <lj user>).